ABSTRACT
Objectives: Data about COVID-19 patients treated with veno-arterial-ECMO (VA-ECMO) is limited. Reported survival rates range from 27.9% to 77.8%, depending on VA-ECMO indication. A subgroup of patients suffers from circulatory failure due to a COVID-19 associated hyperinflammatory state (CovHI). In these patients, differentiation between inflammation and sepsis is difficult but important. In this retrospective case series, differential diagnoses of COVID-19 associated refractory circulatory failure and survival rates in different indications for VA-ECMO are investigated. Method(s): Retrospective analysis of 28 consecutive COVID-19 patients requiring VA-ECMO at the University Hospital Regensburg between March 2020 and May 2022. Specific treatment for COVID-19 was in accordance with respective guidelines. Mycotic infections were either invasive or met current definitions of COVID19-associated-pulmonary aspergillosis. Result(s): At VA-ECMO initiation, median age was 57.3 years (IQR: 51.4 - 61.8), SOFA score 16 (IQR: 13 - 17) and norepinephrine dosing 0.53mug/kg/min (IQR: 0.32 - 0.78). Virus-variants were: 61% wild-type, 14% Alpha, 18% Delta and 7% Omicron. Survival to hospital discharge was 39%. 17 patients were primarily supported with VA-ECMO only (survival 42%), 3 patients were switched from VV to VA-ECMO (survival 0%), and 8 patients were converted from VA to VAV or VV-ECMO (survival 50%). Indications for VA-ECMO support were pulmonary embolism (PE) (n=5, survival 80%), right heart failure due to secondary pulmonary hypertension (n=5, survival 20%), cardiac arrest (n=4, survival 25%), acute left heart failure (ALHF) (n=11, survival 36%) and refractory vasoplegia (n=3, survival 0%). Inflammatory markers at VA-ECMO initiation were higher in patients with ALHF or vasoplegia;in these patients a higher rate of invasive fungal infections (10/14, 71% vs. 4/14, 29%;p=0.023) compared to the other patients was found. Conclusion(s): Survival on VA-ECMO in COVID-19 depends on VA-ECMO indication, which should be considered in further studies and clinical decisions making. Circulatory failure due to vasoplegia should be considered very carefully as indication for VA-ECMO. A high rate of mycotic infections mandates an intense microbiological workup of these patients and must be considered as an important differential diagnosis to CovHI.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Treatment of severe respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 by veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) had a mortality of up to 70% in Germany. Many patients with COVID-19 need VV-ECMO support longer than 28 days (long-term VV-ECMO). Evidence on mortality, complications during intensive care, functional status after discharge and mortality-predictors for patients supported with long-term VV-ECMO is lacking. Method(s): Retrospective study of 137 consecutive patients treated with VV-ECMO for ARDS due to COVID-19 at University Hospital Regensburg from March 2020 to March 2022. Result(s): 38% (n=52;87% male) of patients needed longterm VV-ECMO support. In these, SOFA score (median [IQR]) at ECMO initiation was 9 [8-11], age 58.2 [50.6- 62.5] years, PaO2/FiO2-ratio 67 [52-88] mmHg, pCO262 [52-74] mmHg, Murray-Score 3.3 [3.0-3.6] and PEEP 15 [13 - 16] cmH2O. Duration of long-term support was 45 [35-65] days. 26 (50%) patients were discharged from the ICU. Only one patient died after hospital discharge. At VVECMO initiation, baseline characteristics did not differ between deceased and survivors. Complications were frequent (acute kidney injury: 31/52, renal replacement therapy: 14/52, pulmonary embolism: 21/52, intracranial hemorrhage 8/52, major bleeding 34/52 and secondary sclerosing cholangitis: 5/52) and more frequent in the deceased. Karnofsky index (normal 100) after rehabilitation was 70 [57.5-82.5]. Twelve of the 18 patients discharged from rehabilitation had a satisfactory quality of life according to their own subjective assessment. Four patients required nursing support. Mortality-predictors within the first 30 days on VV-ECMO only observed in those who deceased later, were: Bilirubin >5mg/dl for > 7 days, pulmonary compliance <10ml/mbar for >14 days, and repeated serum concentrations of interleukin 8 >150ng/L. Conclusion(s): Long-term extracorporeal lung support in patients with COVID-19 resulted in 50 % survival and subsequently lead to a satisfactory quality of life and functionality in the majority of patients. It should preferably be performed in experienced centers because of a high incidence of complications. Several findings during the early course were associated with late mortality but need validation in large prospective studies.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: In COVID-19 associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring VV-ECMO, ventilator-associated-pneumonia (VAP), pulmonary aspergillosis and viral reactivations are observed frequently, but there is only little knowledge on incidence, onset and causative pathogens. This study analyzes frequency of VAP, pulmonary aspergillus infections, and viral reactivations in a large cohort of patients with ARDS treated with VV-ECMO due to either COVID-19 or Influenza. Method(s): Retrospective analysis of all consecutively patients at the University Hospital Regensburg requiring VVECMO due to COVID-19 (March 2020 and May 2022) or Influenza (May 2012 and December 2022). VAP was diagnosed according to current guidelines. Pulmonary Aspergillosis met criteria of probable COVID-associated Aspergillosis according to current guidelines. Result(s): 147 patients (age (median [IQR]) 55.3 [48.7 - 61.7], SOFA at VV-ECMO initiation 9 [8 - 12], 23 [14 - 38] days on VV-ECMO) suffering from COVID-19 and 72 influenza patients (age 55.3 [46 - 61.3], SOFA at VV-ECMO initiation 13 [10 - 15], 16 [10 - 23] days on VV-ECMO) were included in the analysis. Pulmonary superinfections were more frequent in COVID-19 than in influenza (VAP: 61% vs. 39%, pulmonary Aspergillosis: 33% vs. 22%, CMV reactivation: 19% vs. 4%, HSV reactivation: 49% vs. 26%.) The first episode of VAP in COVID-19 and Influenza was detected 2 days [1 - 15] after and 1 day (-3 - 22) before ECMO initiation, respectively. First VAP-episode in COVID-19 were mainly caused by Klebsiella spp. (29%,), Staphylococcus aureus (27%) and E. coli (11%). Further VAP-episodes (30% in COVID-19) and relapses of VAP were mainly caused by Klebsiella spp. (53%, 64%, respectively). In Influenza, VAP was mainly caused by Staphylococcus aureus (28%) and Streptococcus pneumoniae(28%), further VAP episodes were not observed. Conclusion(s): Superinfections were common in patients treated with VV-ECMO and occur more frequently in COVID-19 ARDS compared to Influenza. VAP occurs early and may significantly contribute to the need of VV-ECMO. Therefore, a meticulous routine microbiologic workup is advisable. The observed differences in the spectrum of secondary infectious agents in COVID19 compared to Influenza are not understood yet.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: At the beginning of the pandemic, it was believed that severe SARS-CoV2 infection would induce lifelong immunity and that reinfections would be unlikely. However, several cases of reinfection were documented in previously infected patient and the waning humoral immunity has raised significant concerns. Accordingly, long-term and durable vaccineinduce antibody protection against infection have also become a challenge, as several breakthroughs of COVID-19 have been identified in individuals partially or fully vaccinated. This study describes the incidence, the characteristics of severe COVID-19 infections requiring ECMO occurred after vaccination and the presence of side effects related to the vaccine. Method(s): EuroECMO COVID is a prospective, multicenter, observational study, developed by the EuroELSO, based on data from patients aged >=16 years who received ECMO support for refractory COVID-19 during the pandemic in 204 centers. The analysis investigates the survival of vaccinated patient, the associations between management-related variables, the incidence of vaccination during the different pandemic phases, the type of vaccines and the possible side effects. Result(s): Immunosuppressed patients are susceptible to reinfection even after being naturally infected or receiving a full vaccination. Ineffective antibody production, due to relatively ineffective vaccines, inadequate number of doses or the time after vaccination are involved in the pathogenesis of postvaccination infections. This population was found to have a partial immunity due to an inadequate number of doses and an overlapped time from vaccination and SARS-CoV2 incubation with PCR results after being vaccinated. Several manifestations of SARS-CoV2 infection are similar to vaccine-induce side effects and mild symptoms can be presented both as an adverse reaction after vaccination and a result of infection. In this subgroup no side effects were attributable to the vaccine. Conclusion(s): Vaccination does not entirely prevent SARS-CoV2 but will lead to less morbidity and mortality, as demonstrated by less need of ICU and ECMO care. In addition, the partial immunity for inadequate doses of vaccine or through the evolution of new variants demonstrated the importance of further analysis to differentiate the possible causes of waning humoral immunity.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Burnout is one of the many challenges physicians may face in their careers. While there are studies focusing on burnout among surgical specialties, there are limited studies focusing on burn out at different levels of training. The aim of this study is to measure and compare rates of burnout between junior and senior trainees in urological surgery as well as to identify changes in training that could be made to improve work-life balance. METHOD(S): To assess professional burnout, respondents completed the 22-item Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey as part of the 2019 AUA census. Respondents were categorized into junior trainees (PGY1, PGY2, PGY3) and senior trainees (PGY4, PGY5, and fellow). RESULT(S): A total of 512 respondents were included. Senior trainees represented 57% while junior trainees represented 43% of the total cohort. The prevalence of burnout (p=0.005) and high levels of depersonalization (p=0.018) were 50% in junior trainees and 38% in senior trainees. High levels of emotional exhaustion were 9% for junior and 5% for senior trainees (p=0.053) (Table 1). The top changes to improve work life balance for urology trainees were access to meal plans, on-call rooms, and time to attend health appointments (Figure 1). CONCLUSION(S): Juniors experience higher levels of burnout, depersonalization, and emotional exhaustion when compared to seniors. Providing meal plans, on-call quarters, and time to attend health appointments are the top changes to improve work-life balance among urology trainees. These changes may have a dramatic impact on the well-being of our trainees, especially in this post-COVID era. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and commonly presents with fever, loss of smell/taste, and a persistent cough;in severe cases, patients require hospitalisation and external ventilation. Advanced age and pre-existing conditions such as cardiovascular diseases and diabetes have been associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 related mortality. Based on their mechanisms of action and widespread use among patients at high risk of poor disease outcomes, the impact of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors - including angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) - on COVID-19 related outcomes has become a topic of interest, resulting in rapid dissemination of a large number of predominantly retrospective, observational studies since early 2020. Since many of these studies were limited in scope and results were inconclusive, systematic reviews and meta-analyses of published and unpublished findings swiftly followed. Aim: To assess the effect of ACEIs and ARBs on COVID-19 related outcomes by summarising the currently available evidence. Methods: Umbrella review of systematic reviews and subsequent meta-analysis. Eligible for inclusion were systematic reviews with meta-analysis focusing on patients with or without COVID-19 exposed to ACEIs and/or ARBs compared to patients not exposed to the medication. Outcomes of interest included risk of infection;hospitalisation;severity;and death. Reviews were identified through a literature search in Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, the Cochrane database of systematic reviews, and medRxiv, from 2019 until 1st of February 2021. Data was extracted using a standardised extraction sheet;the AMSTAR 2 Critical Appraisal Tool for systematic reviews was used for quality assessment. Heterogeneity between studies was evaluated using I2 statistics, and findings of included meta-analyses were summarised using random-effects models. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021233398). Results: Out of an initial 157 publications, 66 systematic reviews underwent full text screening;after further exclusions based on pre-specified criteria, 47 studies were identified to be relevant. The number of included studies as well as the outcomes of interest varied widely between reviews, with death being the most common. Odds ratio for risk of COVID-19 infection among patients treated with ACEIs/ARBs versus patients not on treatment was 0.99 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.97 - 1.02;19 studies, I2 = 24.7%);and for hospitalisation among COVID-19 patients treated with ACEIs/ARBs versus not on treatment, 1.23 (95% CI 1.04 - 1.46;11 studies, I2 = 76.4%);severe disease 0.86 (95% CI 0.78 - 0.95;28 studies, I2 = 68%);and death, 0.80 (95% CI 0.75 - 0.86;47 studies, I2 = 51.9%). Conclusion: While treatment with ACEIs or ARBs does not appear to impact the risk of COVID-19 infection, it appears that patients on treatment have lower risks of severe disease and mortality compared to patients not on ACEIs/ARBS treatment. Findings should be interpreted cautiously as the systematic reviews/meta-analyses included in this study were of variable quality, and there was high heterogeneity among studies for most outcomes. Findings will inform evidenced-based guidelines on the appropriate measures for patients at risk of COVID-19 infection and prescribed RAAS inhibitors.
ABSTRACT
Background: Understanding viral kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 is important to assess risk of transmission, manage treatment, and determine the need for isolation and protective equipment. Children have been noted to have less severe illness than adults and may have less transmission potential. We sought to determine whether children deemed to be asymptomatic had a difference in the PCR cycle threshold (Ct) value of respiratory samples from symptomatic children with SARS CoV-2 infection.
ABSTRACT
Objective: The use of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) has increased significantly in the last years, and in particular in the recent pandemic COVID-19, representing a valuable therapy to treat severe respiratory failure. However, few patients remain hypoxemic and become hemodynamically instable during V-V ECMO support requiring a change in ECMO configuration. Methods: The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry was reviewed for all cases of adult ARDS in patients undergoing ECMO requiring a change in configuration during the support run. (2017 to 2019). All main aspects, if available, characterizing the patients undergoing ECMO support modifications were collected and analyzed in terms of incidence, causes, patterns, complications and outcomes. Results: Of 9936 V-V ECMO runs, there were 354 ECMO that requiring a in changing configurations (3,5%). Over the study period the proportion of ECMO changing configuration was 1,3% (136) for VA, 1,6% (166) for V-VA and 0,8(85%) for Other configurations with an increasing in configuration changing during the years. The mortality rate in the shifting population was 55%. The new configurations were associated with major bleeding, stroke and renal failure was similar. Main determinants of poor outcome were the severity of the underlying illness, the delay in recognizing evolution of the disease, the complications associated with the conversion itself, and the more complex management of the hybrid setting. Conclusions: Our review of ARDS patients showed the variation in configuration VA ECMO or Hybrid ECMO was not associated with worse survival but with a high rates of complications rates compared with VV ECMO. These data suggest that in very selected patients it may reasonable to initially instituted VV ECMO support, reserving VA or Hybrid ECMO forms for conversion for refractory cardiopulmonary failure and cardiogenic shock that represent the major reasons of VV ECMO failure.